Houdini's Hideout

Get rid of it!

2011-02-06T01:18:00.000-08:00

The BBC, increasingly, is becoming more and more rampantly biased towards the left and Labour. They always have been, but they now show it more and more openly.

Look at this headline which implies a fact and is carried page top in most pages: Police to lose 10000 officers by 2013 only that isn't a fact at all. The headline underneath says SUGGESTS Labour research. So it is an implication drawn from biased and partisan research carried out by the main opposition. This is blatant anti-coalition/pro Labour propoganda.

Cameron should have the balls to privatise it. It isn't wanted by the general public and Cameron would gain a million votes overnight just by saying he was scrapping it.

Quality? Don't make me laugh. The only people who think it is quality is those with vested interests, and anything that was true quality is made by contacted out sources. The BBC itself makes very little true original quality programming.

The telly tax needs scrapping, and it needs scrapping now, but does Cameron have the balls? I thought he was a wet weekend up until the past few weeks when he has started telling it how it is, like the multiculturalism has failed speech...maybe he isn't as wet as we though and was just getting his feet and formulating a strategy, but we'll wait and see.

Europes Morality?

2010-12-05T02:11:00.000-08:00

It goes to show just how sleazy and morally bankrupt Europe is when this fucker gets awards...

Sodomising paedophile honoured

Roman Polanski is a sodomising paedophile.

Halal is slaughter?

2010-10-03T01:54:00.000-07:00

Halal slaughter is reported all over the news as slaughter, but is it and do we want it?

I like to think I'm a compassionate and good person so I don't want halal anything as I think it's cruel. I get invited on game shoots all the time from August until the end of January or February but rarely if ever go because my freezer is stocked with game and the notion of going just to kill is not my cup of tea, and while out I would never take a shot, never, without I was confident of a clean kill.

Why? Because anything else would be cruel.

So why must we be forced to eat halal by the supermarkets just to make sure we appease the rag headed muslim cunts?

Halal is NOT fucking ritual slaughter, it is RITUAL FUCKING SACRIFICE! I don't want to eat meat that is ritually sacrificed to a foreign god, and the why the fuck should I? What next, chickens killed by satanists on a black altar at midnight to make nuggets for Mcdonalds?

Where is the compassion and civilised society we all squeal about? Where's the RSPCA?

Saudi Arabian raghead money talks in the west.

Veterans Corps?

2010-08-27T01:06:00.000-07:00

I'm an ex soldier. I am a veteran. I served with real soldiers and not some REMFs. I was never badly wounded personally, though it was close. I have seen badly wounded soldiers and helped them. I have spoke and got pissed with them. I come from a position of knowledge.

It may surprise some people to hear me say this, but disabled and badly injured soldiers should not be placed back with their regiments, however valuable their contribution may be. Front-line units should be manned by able bodied soldiers and able bodied soldiers alone. Men with no legs or serious disabilities should NOT be serving alongside soldiers at unit level as part of the Regiment. They are a reminder of what could happen and could be a bar to good morale.

It is a shame and I feel sorry for them, I sympathise and empathise completely, but I'm sorry, YOU ARE NOT NOW A REAL SOLDIER AND NEVER WILL BE. It is going to take some hard love to make the public, the MOD, the Government and the disabled men themselves realise they are no longer soldiers. When you reach a certain age you are considered no longer a viable soldier so are tossed out, and that is fair enough, but a 50 year old man with great experience is better equipped and able than a man with no legs, or blind, or deaf, or whatever; there is no sympathy or compassion there, and we should have no sympathy or compassion with the wounded in terms of how they are returned to a regiment.

I'm sorry if I upset anyone, but it is ridiculous to see a soldier back at the Parachute Regiment, in uniform, with no legs, or an arm missing. Same for the Guards, or the Anglians, or the Marines, or indeed any front line unit.

But there is a solution that could utilise the old and the disabled ex-soldiers skills, and make them a very valuable part of the forces while avoiding the possibility of lowering morale amongst the young and impressionable, as well as married men or those with families, at unit level. It also has the fringe benefit of giving employment to people who are skilled and already trained, and we can get rid of many of the useless bureaucrats and civvy hangers on.

Form a Veterans Corps and structure it much like the REME whereby men are given attachments as an LAD (Light aid detachment), but with clerk or stores jobs, or perhaps any form of administration or even training.

For those who do not know, and that is most, front line units do not have their own members of the unit who perform technical tasks such as mechanics and electricians for the vehicles, armourers for the weapons, and technicians of various manners; these tasks are performed by Craftsmen from the Royal Electrical Mechanical Engineers or the Logistics Corps. These men will have approximately 2 year postings to a unit, and this could be any unit from Paras to Guards, to Hussars, and anywhere. These men are part of the unit and do everything the unit does but wear their own cap badge and after 2 years move on to another unit. I was a GPMG gunner in the Falklands as part of an infantry regiment and an infantryman from that unit was my number 2, but I wore a REME cap badge and carried my tools and spares in my bergan and was expected, and did, carry out my role as an armourer as well.

Why not a Veterans Corps staffed with wounded and disabled ex servicemen, and those who have completed their service but are recruited to that Corps? They could do all the jobs done by civvys, in the main, be attached to any regiment virtually anywhere, be extremely valuable and cost effective as thy need paying anyway as a wounded ex serviceman, and get to keep the esprit de corps they enjoyed and perhaps crave. They would be posted to regiments as say office staff and store-men and have their own cap badghe and structure, but still be part of the regiment but with a specific task.

It is a win win situation and I'll see if I can develop the idea more.

David Laws, homo at large...

2010-05-30T07:54:00.001-07:00

So who is David Laws, in actuality, and why are there mountains of people lining up to defend him and call him the best politician to ever fucking live?

Let's get this straight (nar nar), this fucker is a Lib Dem and a member of the coalition Government for only some very short weeks, so how has anyone come to the conclusion he is a great politician and a valuable member of the Government? He's done fuckall yet, he hasn't had time!

Would homonazis like Iain Dale have given the slightest shit about him had he not been homosexual? Would he have given even less of a very tiny shit if he had not been elected as a Lib Dem and a coalition formed? Would anyone have tried to mitigate his guilt if he had been heterosexual and giving the money to female mistress?

This man fiddled his expenses to give profit to his boyfriend, whether it was a good deal for the taxpayer or not, as many have claimed, is irrelevant. The allowances are not there to be abused and used to fund homosexual boyfriends. It has further been claimed that Laws had the arrangement to keep his homosexuality quiet, but I don't buy that; if this was a real account of what occurred then why did he not just live privately and give nothing to his boyfriend? Why not have a mortgage and let his boyfriend stay? Why not have a mortgage and commute to each others houses? The simple answer was because he thought he could get away with it. Was it an excuse for Jacqui Smith who had a similar arrangement with her sister?

It seems to me that this fucker has tried everything to mitigate his guilt by playing the homo card, aided and abetted by people who a fortnight ago wanted to see him thrown out of Parliament.

It is yet another example of the shameful disregard for anyone but themselves shown by the homo nazi cult in Westminster who have largely legislated to make anyone not loving them and engaging in homo sex as criminal.

Browns Economic Illiteracy

2010-05-02T02:52:00.001-07:00

We have heard many times the dishonest and deceitful claim by Brown that scrapping the yet to be introduced 1 pence increase in National Insurance, an income tax by another name, will take £6billion out of the economy and put at risk the recovery, if recovery there is.

We amongst most other people with half a braincell rattling about our heads know this is shite, but let's run with it for a second just to prove the point.

In the Guardian, link, Brown attacks Clegg and makes many claims and statements, but the one that stood out for me was this as he attacked the Tories:

"They would take away tax credits from a million people. So, they take away people's consuming power, their spending power. You take money out of the economy; that means that people have less to spend.
"It means that people buy less. It means that retail is affected. It means that all sorts of things happen as a result of that. Then you take away £6bn from the public services and that means teachers' jobs, it means police jobs."

So if the Tories take money from people that would curb their spending power on retail and that would affect jobs and the recovery, and also if the Tories don't take money from people, NI rise, and leave it for them to spend on retail, that would also affect jobs and the recovery.

Brown has found the perfect attack on the Tories and even though he completely contradicts himself I have no doubt will continue this line of attack.

It shows his complete dishonesty and economic illiteracy.

Case closed and take the guilty bastard down.

Mrs Dale Again

2010-04-28T01:25:00.000-07:00

Iain Dale has come in for some well deserved stick from me in the past, but never has he deserved it more than he does now.

According to Dale you should be thrown out of the Tory party unless you accept homosexuality is right and normal, link

More later as I am seething at this and will dissect his post and make some observations on the comments.

Compensation?

2010-04-13T00:27:00.000-07:00

This one really, really, and I mean fucking REALLY, gripped my shit.

If the Tories want to show how they can save money then they couldn't go far wrong saying this would have been legislated against.

Link

So this cunt of a female, who isn't even British, joins the British army and comes here as a serving soldier. She then brings her child over here and finds she has trouble looking after it. She asks for a relative to be brought over to look after the child, and that is refused because of immigration rules. She then misses parades because of looking after the child. She is charged and told that it is not acceptable. She says is being racially and sexually discriminated against and is up for £100k compensation.

WHAT THE FUCK!

I'm ex forces and she shouldn't fucking BE THERE if she can't even make a parade! She isn't British so should not be getting any compo anyway, just send the cunt back to where it fucking came from! Give the money to serving soldiers dying and being maimed for the country!

I'm near speechless with rage.

LibDum cretins getting too easy a ride

2010-04-10T15:10:00.001-07:00

So I decided they needed a poster doing.

and also the blank for people to do some more for them.

So what?

2010-04-02T09:12:00.000-07:00

So another fucker has resigned from the Governments Drugs Advisory Committee because mephedrone has been criminalised.

Link

So fucking what?

Don't get me wrong, I hate this Government with a passion, but it is up to the Government what is and isn't criminalised, not some jumped up fucking employee. Listen you fucker, your job is to advise, not to make policy and decisions on what is and isn't criminal, got it you jumped up little fucker?

Just For GOT

2010-03-28T15:00:00.001-07:00

I thought this was very apt.

We should copy the example!

2010-03-09T11:02:00.001-08:00

So the US has given a massive and lucrative contract for its military to a US company.

Boeing awarded the contract.

Quite fucking right!

They are an American company, working for the American military, using the American public tax dollars... of course a US company should get the contract.

WE should follow their lead and make sure that our workers benefit from the tax pounds our military spends instead of some fucking foreign twats like this Government loves to do.

What a prat

2010-03-07T02:41:00.000-08:00

There are few prominent people in the media who are more unqualified to comment and compile a list of the most influential celebrities than Piers Morgan, and that for the very reason he gives as disqualifying so many; that a Z lister doesn't deserve recognition.

Morgan is the ultimate, in ultimate Z listers. He has no discernible talent other than being an annoying twat that has played on his lefty ideology and getting sacked for telling the truth about the people he has since sucked and swallowed over.

His main page makes a few statements on what constitutes a leading celebrity, so let's look at that then move on to the actual lists. Link. Remember the name of this list is celebrities who really matter, but of course what constitutes what really matters isn't stated as you would expect. So what we are being subjected to is a list of celebrities that a Z lister celebrity thinks matter, and he even ridiculously starts by stating that anyone who irritates him don't count...world class stars like Robbie Coltrane and Christian Bale!

So not a lost of the 100 British celebrities that matter, but who you have an affectation for? That sounds closer the mark, but let's see if we can prove the point with a selected few in the many nothings listed. I can't do all the ones this fucking idiot listed as that would take too long, jst the selected few.

Page one is also 100 counting down 79:

Heather Mills? What a fucking cretin you are Morgan. A chav gold digger with no discernible talent...ohh but wait, you actually know her? So you are re-affirming your own status then by being a celebrity by proxy? More later.
Sienna Miller? You show her picture to a thousand people and 999 won't know who the fuck she is, she is famous for fucking Jude Law, and that's about it. how does she matter?
Holly Willoughby? Second rate chav presenter? Are we talking the same person?
Adrian Chiles? ADRIAN FUCKING CHILES!? Ahhh, hold on, we have a further pattern emerging. Labour supporting cunts AND celebrity by proxy.
David Tennant? Dr Who, and little else, except of course for sucking on Labour cock.
Paul O'Grady? Labour cock sucker, rhetorical and otherwise.
Eddie Izzard? Second rate all rounder...except for sucking on Labour cock...of course.

78 to 56

Stella McCartney? Fuck off you prick. This is celebrity by proxy again.
Paxman? He is an irrelevance.
Ross Kemp? Second rate hard man wannabe and Z list soap actor, and not very good at that.
Christine Bleakley? That skinny fucking pig that has no discernible talent other than presenting a show with that male mirror Chiles?
Colleen Rooney? What can I say but...ROFLMFAO!! Morgan, you are a cunt of the first order!
Sir Alex Ferguson? Sucks on multiple Labour cocks, as long they don't spook his race horses or smudge the paintwork on his Rolls Royce.
Emma Watson? Second rate actress who will disappear into obscurity once the HP films die down. Celeb by proxy again eh wanker?
Daniel Radcliffe? Same as above.
David Walliams? Piss take and celeb by proxy again.
JLS.....even a loud laugh can't express the ridiculous notion that they matter as celebrities.

55 to 31, and getting bored.

Gordon Ramsey and Graham Norton? WTF!
Leona Lewis? Ahh, hold on, a further pattern of people you know and are employed and promoted by your money man and the one you suck up to, Simon Cowell.
Robbie Williams? Fuck off, he is a nothing now and hasn't been. Always in Gary Barlow and the rests shadow and only given air time once they went off the scene.
James Corden and Michael Macintyre? Two semi fair comedians, who you may know?
Frank Lampard? Stay off the weed you fucking cretin.
Jonathan Ross is now ridiculous, as is that fucking unfunny annoying nasal Essex whining cunt cretin Russel Brand. Both are at best an irrelevance. I suppose you know them too?

30 to 11 and losing the will to love...

Lily Allen? Second rater, but wait, father Keith will suck and swallow on Labour cock til' the cows come home won't he, so there we have it.
Wayne Rooney? The man that can hardly string three words together is someone that matters?
Amanda Holden? Fucking useless actress and not particularly pleasant on the eye, famous for sucking Les Dennis' cock until she made it with second rate parts then divorce? Ahh, but is part of the Cowell brand isn't she?
Tony Blair? Universally reviled and held in total contempt? Is he your mate?
Can I be bothered now?

Lord Sugar? Fuck off..another Labour stooge, but only while the money flows.
Rio 'it goes up my nose' Ferdinand? Speechless.
Paul McCartney? A total and complete irrelevance, and always has been since the Beatles split up.
Robert Pattinson? He's only done the basic of the basic to even qualify as a celebrity, but you can brush shoulders with him can't you?
Cheryl Cole? Second rate singer. Spends more on her appearance but is less honest about it than Katie Price. Is a total construct. If she was so gorgeous and sexy why does her husband serially shag others? Second rate chav created to make Cowell money.

Morgan is a very seriously deluded man if he thinks this is a list of those that matter in the world of celebrity and he is getting 'notoriety' mixed up with 'matter' in any case. Most of these in this list are either has beens, never beens or Z list anyway.

I always though Morgan was a wanker, and this just reaffirms that view.

Typical Labour hypocrites...

2010-02-28T11:38:00.000-08:00

So Baroness Quin thinks Prince Charles isn't fit to be King because he meddles in politics and writes letters to Ministers and MP's all the time.

Baroness Quin, a Minister in Tony Blair’s Government, says Charles’s activities ‘verge on the grotesque’ and ‘will need to be curbed if he is to undertake the duties of a monarch’.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1254311/Queens-Privy-Counsellor-said-meddling-Charles-unfit-king.html#ixzz0grSfBac7

Well it's like this you fucking Labour cretinous hag; who the fuck elected you? He has as much right to speak and put pressure on the Government as anybody else, in fact more as technically he is responsible for the people of the UK above and beyond fucking politicians like you who were appointed because they sucked on other politicians cocks, either literally or rhetorically.

So who the fuck elected you?

Who the fuck elected cock sucking LORD Mandelsonboysring? He is effectively the most powerful man in the UK and has never had a single vote cast for him.

Who the fuck elected any one of the twats whose only claim to fame is giving dodgy donations to the corrupt, sleazy and incompetent criminals of Labour?

People like you Quin need to fuck off and stop being such utter fucking hypocrites.

Beat this fucker!!!!

2010-02-27T14:49:00.001-08:00

Beat this fucker then!!

Most apt verification EVER!!Beat this fucker!

XXX version now available

2010-02-26T13:11:00.000-08:00

Pinch and distribute just as you like...

2010-02-21T16:15:00.000-08:00

Just a first and rough draft. Will try and get time to tweek sometime in the next day or so.

Feel free to pinch and if you want to wait for the XXX version then please do, coming soon.

I might get back into this and have a few basic ideas

Are they the demons?

2010-02-14T03:42:00.000-08:00

I hold no torch for the BNP or their ilk, but they have been demonised for decades by the mainstream parties and their media lackeys, so what now after the likes of Dizae and his criminalisation and use of a charge of racism to get away with all manner of criminal acts?

Peter Hitchens was once a good bloke with a good agenda, after he got rid of his ridiculous socialist ideals, but is now going backwards, link.

This is a great article and very, very true, but what a shame it has taken him, amongst others, so many years to gird their loins and sau exactly what we ordinary folk have been saying for so many years.

He says:

Despite being from Iran (where, by the way, the local attitude to non-Persians is not all that generous), Dizaei became a panjandrum of that grotesque, indefensible body, the ‘Black Police Association’, whose very existence was long used by the BNP’s hate-merchants

Well aren't you also now one of those same hate merchants Mr Hitchens? Even two years ago anyone daring to say what you are saying, let alone in print, would be branded a hate filled fascist and racist. The difference between you and the BNP is one of timing. They were saying these things many years ago when you were whining to have the Dazaies of this world put into power. People like you created the BNP, who are hateful and to be despised, but not for any racist policy or annoucements, it is because they are socialists and destroyers of progress.

Labour fucked it up before...

2010-02-11T01:42:00.001-08:00

So they are talking about the UK going into the market for space technology and research.

Link

It sounds a bit late, but most people don't know that the UK had the first true space programme and we were the pioneers, in the 50's and going into the 60's. We had the worlds first space rocket programme and had the first plans for manned space flight, not to mention satellite technology.

So what went wrong?

The Labour party, socialists and Tony Benn.

Bunch of hypocrites.

Proving the Terry point...

2010-02-05T12:24:00.000-08:00

You see? Link

John Terry is not a drug dealer and user and is not a criminal in the US and not a criminal in the UK. He is castigated and loses his job as captain of the England football team. He is shunned and derided.

If only he was a criminal drug taking fucking cock sucking arse bandit, he would be feted and paid a lot of money by the BBC and his 'crimes' would be expunged.

Boy fucking George should not be allowed a TV set where impressionable youth can be influenced, and he certainly should not have programmes made about him where he will earn large fees.

Just goes to show that white heterosexual males are the most discriminated against.

If only...

2010-02-01T02:55:00.000-08:00

...John Terry was a cock sucking knob jockey.

He wouldn't be singled out for all this sordid notoriety over his private life would he? He would be deified like Stephen Gateley.

If he was a shit pusher he would be up for promotion an head this new 'Gay Is Best' campaign for the Tories and the other one by Labour and the Government.

He would be in schools telling the kids how wonderful homo is and those filthy and terrible heteros should be damned and sacked from their jobs.

If only eh?

If only...

2010-02-01T02:41:00.000-08:00

....the Chandlers, being held in Somalia by pirates, weren't British white and Christian, they would probably have been back in the UK months ago!

If only they had been an Ethiopian foreign muslim scum and a terrorist suspect held at Guantanamo, to be held back in the UK as a terrorist suspect, they would have had heaven and earth, and unlimited funds spent, to secure their release. Then a Government minister would go and get them in a private plane and escort them here to the UK.

If only they had been a black drug smuggling fucker locked up in a Laos jail, they would have been back months ago, the Government having spent unlimited amounts of our money to secure their release and bring them back under escort of a Government minister in a private charter plane.

Link

If only eh?

Blair Would Do It Again?

2010-01-29T10:03:00.000-08:00

Blair would do what again precisely?

Link

He wasn't in the front line and in any danger, or within a couple of thousand miles of Iraq. His son or indeed any relative wasn't in the front line or in any danger. His son was actually an intern in the White House at the time...nice and safe. He didn't suffer any loss at all.

So he would do it again? He would enhance his profile in the USA in readiness for charging millions for after dinner speaking. He would be awarded the Congressional Medal of Honour. He would bask in the glory in the USA. He would take the millions in lucrative contracts and endorsements from around the world. Take the millions of tax payers money for fictitious roles in Government like Middle East envoy. Take the millions worth of free security. Etc. etc. etc.

So, fucking right he would do it again.

The Book is Open!

2010-01-28T01:45:00.000-08:00

So Apple have announced a new Ipad? Big fucking deal, it is a tablet PC in another name. Why do the media go mad over them? Every news channel and every news site waited with baited breath for the announcement from Apple yesterday. It's a piece of fucking technology you twats! Nothing too strange or new either.

There are now cracks in Apples veneer of innovation and mystique as some channels decided the Ipad and Apple deserved a resounding 'Ho Hum'

They stole the technology for the Ipod, they are now looking set to get their arses wiped for stealing the technology for the Iphone, so now I'm opening a book on how long it takes for someone to sue them for stealing the technology tha drives the Ipad.

My initial guess is 3 months.

You fucking what?!

2010-01-23T09:37:00.000-08:00

So a terrorist scumbag is going to tell the British Government how to police NI?

Link

I genuinely think they should be hung and not Governing NI.

I picked up body parts in NI, I saw men killed in NI, I spent a lot of time in NI defending democracy and freedom from these fuckers, and now Labour, and they will, will give the ultimate power to the IRA terrorist fucking scum.

Sickening to those who fought to keep the place safe and free for three decades, and those who died. Not anyone connected to Brown, Blair or Mandelson of course, but ho hum, those people are only fodder for NI, Iraq and Afghanistan. Though it should be pointed out that they are good enough to die for Afghans and Iraqis, but not British loyalists in NI.

Update:

Apparently Gordon Brown is having talks with the PM of Eire on the future of policing in NI. Call me old fashioned, but why is a British Prime Minister talking to a foreign country on the structure of a police force and policy in a part of the fucking United Kingdom?

(I know we did before in the 90's, but that was a security issue and not policing specifically)

Nokia, amongst others, versus Apple

2010-01-18T09:59:00.000-08:00

I love this, I really do...link

Apple have a real history of stealing, literally, other peoples technology and innovation and passing it off as their own, then marketing it as their own with a blaze of glory and self aggrandisement.

Apple acolytes, those sad fuckers who now own and buy x86 technology and who are so fucking anal about the Apple shite, will wave it off as sour grapes. It isn't.

Apple has always charged far more than anyone else for technology that is really no better. In the beginning Apple had a nice GUI, and that was it and that is the basis for the whole myth of Apple quality, reliability and innovation.

I know because I sold them, I worked with them, I owned them. I also owned and ran PC's since 1986. Apples are no more reliable though the pre-windows systems looked better and worked better for graphical apps. That was a long time ago.

If anyone tries to say Apple is innocent, then here's an anecdote. When the Ipod came out I bought a Creative Zen; it was cheaper, had more memory and was generally, to me, a better piece of kit at a cheaper price. No end of people told me I was mad and the Ipod was much better etc. etc. I demonstrated that the Creative Zen could use any format and was easy to use and upload to from the PC with everything coming supplied you needed. It was all swept away by Apple cretinous acolytes and would still be today, were it not for the fact that the technolody used in the Ipod was stolen directly from Creative. Creative sued Apple and Apple paid one of the largest settlements ever and continues to do so for every Ipod sold. Thieves.

They will probably lose to Nokia and Kodak, but will it make a difference to their supporters? No chance, and that is why they continue to do it and get away with it. They will make 100 million and pay out 90million, but are still in profit.

Iain Dake...a perfect example

2010-01-18T01:57:00.000-08:00

Iain Dale is being targeted by me as an example not because I dislike him but because he is one of the high profile examples, and also one of the most obvious. Just look at his 'stat porn' as he swings his handbag around in the fight for top slots in the blogosphere.

He is a perfect example of what? A perfect example of why we need to roll back the upsurge in people wishing to become professional politicians, and we need to get back to politicians being there first for the people, secondly for the ideology and their convictions, thirdly for their party who may Govern as a whole, and lastly for themselves. It probably started before, but Blair looks likes he could have been the first to properly exploit politics for personal gain and status. Mandelson of course was with him and to a lesser degree Brown who is too much a slave to his failed and dishonest ideology of socialism.

These people, like Dale, have no real sense of loyalty to anything other than themselves and their desire to become one of the 'movers and shakers' of Westminster. Look at Dales blog from the past few months and his coverage of the sleazy and slimy fucker Alistair Campbell, or even Mandelson. His lack of attack of these men is marked and also he has created a system where he pushes left wing and Labour blogs; his daily dozen has probably been more pro Campbell and Labour, specifically, than Tory. Why? His links have followed this trend. Why?

The likes of Campbell, unelected, disliked, corrupt and beyond contempt, and without any real scruples, ran the Government into a war. How could a press officer write the justification and intelligence that took this country to war? Who gave him the power and authority to decide whether our troops and hundreds of thousands of others lived, died and got maimed? This fucking press officer who lorded over military, intelligence and political superiors? Not to mention moral superiors. The club and Westminster insider elite is what gave him the authority, and it is that same club and authority that the likes of Dale seeks.

He is a claimed Tory and wants to become a Tory MP, but you must ask ourself why such a high profile, in the media, Tory, can't attract support for a decent seat.

Most prospective politicians seem to have fallen into this category of wannabe. Modern prospective politicians are a pussy whipped fucking shadow of their former selves as they seek to become one of the club, and will do anything and dump anyone and any ideology to become one of the club. Blair did and many others did since 1997. They are trying to be nice and not rock the boat.

Could you see Thatcher laying down and taking the lies and deceit of Brown and Labour without a fight and saying nothing as she seeks to portray herself as a kindly and good soul who doesn't want politics to descend into personal attack and anarchy? Fucking right she wouldn't, but this is what the present Tory party and hierarchy do...no more ya boo politics for them, and that is exactly what Labour wants them to do. Soft and sorry bunch who need to fight back on Alistair Campbells terms, not suck his rhetorical cock and swallow his sperm like Dale does. The Tories need to take advice from people outside the Westminster bubble, people whop don't necessarily crave being in that particular club but who believe in Tory values and hate socialism for the evil that it is. They might then get into the sort of electoral lead they should be in instead of languishing at a constant ten percent.

Dale, grow some fucking balls and chuck the pink handbag away and replace it with a pink wallet. Do you never wonder why such a high profile person can not get past being a failed PPC? Concentrate on being a Tory and attack Labour and their supporters then you will get into the Westminster club. People like Campbell will bring you down if it suits their purpose, so don't fete them as you have been doing.

Be a Tory first and politician second, though why should you listen to me? I'm only one of the fucking peasants outside the Westminster bubble so know fuck all. Isn't that right?

The Westmonster Elite

2010-01-04T13:40:00.001-08:00

An issue has been niggling me for a long period concerning many so called bloggers, who may once have had ideals and opinions that were valid but are now just part of the self styled elite, or striving to become one of those who style themselves as part of the Westminster elite, that cares nothing for the people who vote for them, pay their wages and keep them from falling back into obscurity, or the policy, party and ideals they may once have held.

The actual vote, specifically, and gaining a foothold on the gravy train followed by a rise up the tacit pole is the driving factor, and that needn't be anything to do with a specific political party or ideology.

Blair was probably the first who strived tirelessly and overtly to get ahead regardless of party and ideology, and in fact probably had no party or ideological allegiance, and succeeded, and he is being followed ever more forcefully and in larger numbers. Blair wasn't good enough to gain a safe seat as a Tory, despite being president of his student union Young Conservatives and a leading Tory member as a student, or his father being a lifelong Tory party member; he just couldn't cut it in the real world. He saw an opportunity to change allegiance with Tony Benn, another champagne socialist who shed the overt capitalist and privileged status he enjoyed but retained every covert trapping of status and privilege he could, as a member of CND. Blair could claim to have switched allegiance on principle and as a result, with Benn a senior champagne socialist, was given a safe Labour seat. It was a coup at a time when Labour needed any shred of hope. So Blair ditched his ideals, principles and allegiances purely for position, and loking at what he achieved on his own behalf he succeeded.

Now we have his followers and those who inherit his dishonest style online. I pick out the few because they are relevant and can demonstrate well how the system of blogs is dying and becoming ever more disagreeable to many, and why there are so many blogs which are becoming more than just an online rant. I am also a Tory and see these as true cretins and turncoats as they are Torys too. (Paul Staines may claim not to be, but do we believe him?)

Iain Dale, and Guido Fawkes, are points in fact where becoming one of the elite and member of the inner sanctum of the rarefied political club which is Westminster is more important than anything else, I would say especially for Dale as Paul Staines seems to revel in money and basically a modicum of power. There are of course others like Dizzy but to a lesser degree, and there are those who do not use their influence to do anything other than attack Labour, like Tory Bear, but a single one is too many as it allows Labour to grow and prosper online.

There are many questions I would ask; why would a senior Tory push and link to senior Labour figures, and especially some who are at best disgraced? Why would any Tory supporter help Labour to establish an online presence?

Maybe I am wrong, but I would say that anyone who supports Labour is a fucking moron and is a disgrace and I would never link to them or their articles, even if it was to try and show them up as it is giving them the oxygen of publicity and is helping them, so why do some do it?

We've heard the arguments put forward that healthy debate is good for democracy and an online presence of the left is a good thing to stop right wing sites becoming stale, but I don't subscribe to that rubbish.

Iain Dale has favourites links to Bob 'the fucking union parasite' Piper, Alistair Campbell (of all fucking people!), Labourlist, Tom Harris MP (Labour), Labourhome, Tom Watson (for fucks sake!) and Hopi Sen, to name just a few. And this is not including his famous daly dozen or so that invariably stars Labour bloggers and sites. Iain Dale, and others knowingly like Guido Fawkes, helped establish Labourlist and Derek Draper, but of course fell out with them shortly and Draper was dumped.

They promote them, they help them, and they have established them online. Why? Well look at how the stat porn they wank over works and you can see they love them for links and referrals but that is only because they helped them get established.

So why? I think it is to get inside the Westminster elite. That scumbag Campbell? No problem, he is now Dales best buddy, him and his contacts and influence.

They are not bloggers or partisan followers of any party; they are dishonest.

Appropriate word verification at GOT...

2010-01-03T04:03:00.001-08:00

This is my word verification on GOT on the thread dealing with the raghead scum marching through Wooton Basset.

SCHYT, how very right.

Click the image for a better view.

Paid to leave?

2009-12-23T01:41:00.000-08:00

Why are we paying the fuckers?

Just stick them on a plane and send the fuckers back to where they came from!

link

If the human rights twats object...fuck them and make sure the bastards are on a plane before they have a chance to do anything. Here's another idea, pass legislation! They can do it to make sure the BNP are sent to jail, or to punish people getting bonuses, so why not fucking criminals?

This is Labour in the 21st century.

Yet again they cave in...

2009-12-22T01:31:00.000-08:00

The Tories problem is that they are a bunch of fucking pussys. They get accused of the most mundane and stupid thing, and they make a huge issue out of denying it instead of saying no and shrugging it off.

The latest one is here

My question is so what, even if true?

The article makes a number of comments:

Sensing that the criminal court was at odds with the court of public opinion

Well yes and what should a politician who represents the public do other than listen and act on public opinion, that is what they are fucking paid to do!

Then we have:

Pandering to public opinion after the sentencing of Hussain might appeal to the electorate’s baser instincts.

The electorate, you liberal elite shit and knob sniffing twat, is the only thing that a politician, or indeed any senior public servant, including judges, listen to!

This continues from a few a posts written, but yet to be posted, posts here which show the people running the country don't give a shit about the people or electorate; they are in their position for the power and position and we are merely a means to get there.

Hypocrisy and Conflict of Interest

2009-12-15T15:26:00.001-08:00

This is a good article and demonstrates perfectly how politicians and Labour in particular prove themselves to be utter cocks and hypocrites.

Link

It doesn't matter what you think about Pal or Jew, or indeed the whole issue, this is about the judicial system and fairness in our system, and how a foreign secratary should be above anything other than doing their job.

Milliband said, "Israel was a "close friend" of the UK's and stressed he was keen to "avoid this sort of situation arising again."

I don't remember him or in fact any fucker from Labour moaning about a certain Chilean being arrested in the UK, and besides, last time Milliband was in the Middle East he visited relatives in an illegal West Bank settlement, so not exactly unbiased, and certainly should not be looking at a change in the law. As usual with this shabby bunch, keeping friend safe and well takes precedence, and if a certain law doesn't suit their friends and allies...then change it. This isn't an anti Jew thing; this is about consistency and points to Pinochet, who of course was of the wrong political hue.

The appearance of impropriety and conflict of interest is just as bad as full blown corruption, and how would you tell with a Labour politician?

Only Labour...

2009-12-09T01:37:00.001-08:00

Only Labour could introduce a bonus tax to the private sector, cut the military training budget at a time of war and all while giving huge bonuses to the wasteful, incompetent and useless public sector.

Is it me?

Asking and protesting?

2009-12-02T10:24:00.000-08:00

Google, Facebook, Yahoo and Ebay, amongst others, are asking Peter Mandelson to look again at legislation they say will give unprecedented powers over copyright.

Link

Hold on, who is making these laws? Some unelected, sleazy fucking knob jockey, and huge companies that bring untold wealth into the economy have to fucking grovel to him?

I don't care what party they come from, if they are unelected they should have no power, at all, nada, nothing, especially sleazy, corrupt fuckers like Mandelson.

Swiss intolerance?

2009-11-29T04:16:00.001-08:00

So it is apparently intolerant to propose a ban on minarets and the Swiss Government fears it will damage relations with islamic countries...

Islamic countries? So there are countries that are classed as specifically islamic, and that is not intolerant or wrong, but it would be wrong to try and maintain their own country as Christian based?

Let the muslims fuck off to one of those many islamic countries if they don't like it in Switzerland.

Reminds me of the people, Labour of course, who say we are a racist country and the UK should be for all people of all colours, and actively positively discriminate in favour of black and asians, then tell us that the Raj was wrong and India should be for the INdians and we should apologise for our time there, and that Africa should be for the black man and whites should leave, and be murdered in their thousands because of the colour of their skin.

But of course that is different.

Labour and Baroness Scotland

2009-11-29T02:45:00.000-08:00

They really are two shits in one arse aren't they?

I hope the young Tongan Lapui does what she says and calls her as a witness, and it is all the more poignant given the revelations, if revelations they are as we knew anyway, in the Chilcott inquiry into Iraq.

What will this fucking scag say to the charges that she employed a person legally after claiming she saw a valid passport? She was given the benefit of the doubt, but how can she be telling the truth if it now turns out that Lapui had no passport, seeing as she is being taken to court? Scotland was originally fined for not keeping a record, not for employing her per se, but if she did employ her illegally, she should be charged, and I suspect will be.

Good.

Shameless Brown and his apologists

2009-11-10T09:55:00.000-08:00

I must admit to finding it difficult to appreciate and feel less contempt for those trying to make Brown into some kind of latter day saint, or poor and suffering disabled man who made a 'mere' mistake in a letter to a woman he was trying to console. How many fucking times I am going to have to listen to the utter shite spouted about how he didn't mean any offence so can't really be castigated?

Tories spouting this rubbish is especially galling as they are doing Labours job for them in damage limitation. Just look at the idiots on ConservativeHome, and Mrs Dale, to mention just couple. We mustn't get embroiled in this ... he was trying to do the right thing ... at least he wrote a personal letter ... it wasn't a bad effort for a disabled person ... it is shameful to attack him over this ... the Sun are dragging us into the gutter ... etc. et fucking c ...

For a start, Brown and Labour are telling us, incessantly, that he is not disabled and his eyesight is fine, so is he lying? Do we castigate him for lying? Or do we beat our breasts and not indulge in personal attacks on the lying fucker?

It is said the PM took the trouble...what trouble, given the letter? They talk as if this man is an altruistic member of the public writing with deepest sympathy, instead of the man who sent the soldier to die with a lack of equipment; it would appear he feels guilt more than empathy. He would have done better not to bother than just send a hastily written scrawl full of mistakes where even the name was wrong.

And so what if he wrote this himself, I repeat, so what? This is the LEAST he should do. No-one is calling for press officers to write it for him, but they think it fine that the idiot can't even get one of the army of press officers he employs with our money to check the letter?

These idiots are naive to give him credit for doing the minimum that could be expected, and giving him credit for doing that minimum VERY poorly. Yes, we need to attack Brown at every opportunity, and yes, I think he deserves it now. However, it is not a personal attack NOT to give him credit for doing what he should do, and doing that especially badly; it is called holding him to account. This goes back to the terrible and rarefied naivety Jonathan Isaby and so called Tories demonstrate on the likes of ConservativeHome. They give Labour credit for doing what they are paid to do and giving them credence; they will not and would not return the naive compliment. If they wish NOT to attack on certain issues, then keep quiet. They are seriously naive and idiotic to portray Brown as a victim. Doing Labours PR job for them is not something to be proud of and is naive.

He sent a hastily written, virtually illegible, error strewn letter to a grieving mother and most people believe that his actions in not supplying enough euipment, and cutting the helicopter budget, directly contributed to and led to that young soldiers death, and they want to give him credit for it?

Naive and idiotic, and if the Tories lose the next election or it is hung, or the lead erodes to nothing, you'll know who to blame; them and the likes of Isaby.

The comments in national sites and here are a tiny minority, and again you put forward the extremely silly and naive premise that this is a personal attack for the sake of it; if you think that then dissemble my premise as outlined above.

Right in principle not to attack Brown on this? Look at my comments above again.

Those seeking to give Brown credit look set to campaign to be the most honest, honourable and nicey nicey party...in opposition, for another 13 years. Mrs Janes is, tacitly, another Rose Addis, and her tacit, demonisation in order to make Labour and Brown look better is aided and abetted by Tory supporters.

Brown deserves this attack and more. I believe he probably did send his condolences, but it was sloppily done, like you would expect from a man who sees his underlings as worthy only of sacrifice on his behalf.

If the PR machine that has gone into overdrive shows Brown as the victim, what does that say about him really?

Peter Mandelson and Campbell, who made an art out of being nasty and destroying the careers and lives of people who got in their way on behalf of Labour, Blair and Brown, will be rolling with laughter at the Tories over this, and I am fast losing patience with them.

Update:

And now he shamelessly uses his own daughters death to try and take some of the heat off himself. He may well be telling the truth, but it should be kept private.

Link...

Further update...look at the comments. There are over 500 positives for comments defending Brown and attacking Mrs Janes, and over 600 for the only one there attacking Brown. Campbell and Mandelson have been busy haven't they? I don't believe those figures are real and this is definitely a Rose Addis affair.

Berlin wall?

2009-11-09T01:10:00.000-08:00

I like this from the BBC, and no doubt others too.

Link

Brown had this to say

The wall that had imprisoned half a city, half a country, half a continent, half a world for nearly a third of a century was swept away by the greatest force of all - the unbreakable spirit of men and women who dared to dream in the darkness, who knew that while force has the temporary power to dictate, it can never ultimately decide," he will say. "Its majesty lies not in the presence of a structure, but in its absence. The wall is gone. Two Berlins are one. Two Germanys are one. Two Europes are one.

Really?

This fucker and most of the other shameful fuckers of Labour and those who have been ministers for the past 13 years fought tooth and nail for the communist ideal.

Hypocrites.

Afghan mission

2009-11-06T00:59:00.000-08:00

So what are the mission parameters for Afghanistan? What are our lads dying for?

Brown on GMTV this morning claims it is for UK security and stop terrorism and terrorist training camps. Originally it was meant to be to get Osama Bin Laden. A few years later it was to free the people of Afghanistan.

What will it be next year?

Blair and Brown have sacrificed our troops for their own hubris and to be seen to be world statesmen. They are without shame.

If the Taliban would have handed over Bin Laden, they would still now be in power, and the training camps would still exist, and the people would still be under their yoke. I reject those reasons because of this and believe Blair and Brown did send our troops there for their own reasons, thinking there would be a quick fight; they were wrong and hundreds of our troops are paying the price.

I want to see them in court not making millions.

Racial abuse?

2009-11-05T01:29:00.000-08:00

Are we surprised?

Link

I don't like Griffin, and I don't like the commie far left BNP, but abuse is abuse and he deliberately targeted Griffin on the basis of his skin colour, so this is racial abuse.

But are we surprised he has been acquitted? What message does this put out? Does this mean that white abusers will be cleared of any wrong doing as long as they don't make reference to colour?

EU outrage?

2009-11-05T01:08:00.000-08:00

The French have decided that Camerons stance on Europe will castrate the UK's influence in Europe.

Story here.

Well, what fucking influence now that Blair and Brown have given away all rebates and vetos? What do the EU have against democratic decision making?

Cameron is shown as right. Besides, that the fuck does it have to do with some cheese eating surrender monkey anyway?

Tories and the EU

2009-11-03T09:35:00.000-08:00

Is it me, or is the furore over Cameron and Tories position over the EU and the final ratification of the Lisbon Treaty just plain dumb?

Cameron said he would hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty once he was in power. He is not in power but the Lisbon Treaty is now in force. I personally think he should hold a referendum anyway just to clarify the British public overall opinion on the Treaty and the EU in general; this would be useful for the formulation of future of policy. That being said, I understand that the horse has now bolted so why bother closing the barn door?

So what is the all the furore in the media all about? They and the Labour party seem to be obsessed over the Tory party and their response. Cameron and the Tories are NOT IN POWER, so could not hold a referendum right now or any time even if they wanted to! I personally think the whole furore is politically motivated just to take attention away from the Labour GOVERNMENT and their position on Lisbon and the EU.

Brown, Blair and the Labour GOVERNMENT promised as a manifesto commitment to hold a referendum. They said they would let the British people speak. They reneged on that commitment and are now relishing the Tories and Cameron's discomfort over the issue? Only THIS LABOUR GOVERNMENT could have called a referendum, and they committed to holding one, but haven't, shouldn't they be the ones feeling a certain anti-democratic discomfort? Shouldn't the media be making this the issue of the day?

Shouldn't the Tories? Come on Cameron, give that fucker Brown a kick in the balls at PMQ's and make the main issue you attack with because it would show the fucker up for the twat he is.

Somali kidnap victims

2009-10-31T02:05:00.000-07:00

Two British nationals, a retired couple, have been kidnapped by Somali pirates and rae being held for £4million ransom.

I wonder if the Government will spend as much time and effort trying to free them, and spend as much money, as they did for Ethiopian terrorist Binyam Mohammed? Will a senior Government minister fly to Somalia with a medical team on a private charter, on the taxpayer, if they do get freed like they did with this terrorist piece of fucking shit?

I wonder if the Government will spend as much time and effort on trying to free them and bring them home as they did for Samantha Orobator, the scumbag drug smuggler who deliberately got herself pregnant by artificial insemination to avoid the death sentence in Laos? Will a senior Government minister fly to Somalia with a medical team in a private charter, at the taxpayers expense, to bring them home as they did with this piece of drug smuggling fucking shit?

They are white, Christian and middle class, so I strongly suspect not.

Guido 'shit staines' Fawkes

2009-10-28T02:17:00.000-07:00

I couldn't help laughing out loud at that fucking sell out cunting mong Guido Fawkes and how the comments have been going over the Griffin affair...ROFLMFAO!

It is even funnier reading his cunting mong cop out excuses about how Griffin and the BNP are a threat etc.

Fawkes makes a cunt of himself

What a fucking tool the cunt has turned into.

Update: Had to laugh, almost uncontrollably, at this comment by the cunt himself

495

Guido Fawkes says:

October 28, 2009 at 8:26 am

For the benefit of the hard of thinking, once again, this is private property. There is no freedom of speech, no right of reply, no right to bore Guido’s audience. Guido isn’t stopping you exercising your freedom of speech on your own blog."

If you are, or more likely were, a regular contributor or follower of the Guido Fawkes you would remember that this blog made its name and grew on the back of allowing free speech to anyone, and indeed encouraged controversy, especially from the likes of Griffin; it gave a good excuse for gratuitous abuse. Now alas we come to the comment above where the cunt panders to the advertisers and people who pay him some loot for selling out and only allowing the sanitised version of what made him, and of course only allowing comments by the chosen few.

What a fucking tool, as stated previously, and his blog will now die.

MP's second homes

2009-10-28T02:13:00.000-07:00

I fail to understand what all the fuss is about trying to find a solution.

It would appear that the biggest problem and lock to progress is that MP's themselves want to retain their little money spinner; what else could it be?

It's simple and here is the solution and why it would work. Firstly, you ask MPs to find a second home to buy, if they want one. The State then buys this second home outright for the exclusive use of the MP in question, and retains ownership. The MP then chooses what to furnish the house with, ans this is entered onto an inventory. When the MP finishes with use of this house the inventory is checked and it is either then sold or retained for the use of another MP. This works and has always worked for the forces with quarters, so why not with MPs?

Simple.

Mandelson...

2009-10-11T11:24:00.001-07:00

The papers and media, of all descriptions, like to portray Mandelson as an astute political operator, bordering on genius. I have to ask...why?

Look at his personal history. He was a spin doctor and his only links to 'working class' Labour was that he was an MP in a working class area. He is a middle class, champagne quaffing, white hooray henry. He then fought and cajoled, at the expense of union support and support from other members, to become a Labour NEC member. That was a close run thing. He then fiddled his mortgage and almost went to jail as a result, and resigned his ministerial position in ignominy. He was brought back by Blair but was again embroiled in sleaze and corruption and had to resign for a second time. His reward for resigning over corruption charges was a plum job in Brussels...which he resigned from just before a corruption investigation ended. Of course, once he resigned and was no longer a commissioner, the investigation stopped and it was all quietly forgotten. But wait, he was brought back a third time to this sleazy and corrupt Government, this time as an unelected minister in the Lords. So here is a serially corrupt minister who serially gets caught. Hardly a genius is he?

I hope they use him more and more as the public don't like him, and the Tories should attack the man completely, hey...the fucker isn't elected!

He, and Blair and Brown, made their mark at a time when the Tories were at their lowest and the Labour party were at their dirtiest and most vile. They were elected on an anti-sleaze ticket, on an anti-corruption ticket, and on an open democracy ticket. My how things have changed.

Labour and Mandelson, and that other shyster Campbell, are not geniuses or successful; they were at the right place at the right time, 1997, and have since proven themselves to be anything but savvy operators.

Yvette Cooper talks dishonest Balls!

2009-10-11T05:18:00.001-07:00

Watched QT last night on Iplayer last night, and was amazed at the blatant dishonesty of Yvette Cooper. She was also given the lightest of rides by Dimbledy who allowed her to keep shouting out about the Tories would cut training places and Job Centres and also about her inheritance tax rubbish; she was found wanting when Ian Hislop pointed out she was copying the Tory proposals and was telling fibs about the facts and figures.

I almost stopped listening to Dimbleby altogether when he kept harassing Osborne over the pay freeze for pubic sector workers. Osborne said it was for a single year, and when he said he couldn't see it going for s econd Dimbleby kept pestering him over it...well why not for ten years? Five years? Who fucking know?

Sarah Teather was dire and useless, as befits a LibDum. Quick observation about the LibDums; why do they not strive for second in Parliament? As they are, they are doomed to perpetual third and even lower if they are not careful. This is a golden opportunity for them to take a mid to long term view and destroy Labour at the polls...but no. Strange.

Last observation which then clicked late on, to me and the audience with one of the last member of the audience badgering her and finishing by asking if it isn't time to mention inheritance tax again, when the truth dawned on her lies about the Tories cuts to training etc. There are NO cuts, there are no plans to cut what she claimed, and there are no policies to cut what she claimed. Her premise was that if the Tories don't support a further £5billion fiscal stimulus package, in other words another 5 billion borrowed to throw at the problem without thought or real reform, then this must mean that the Tories are cutting all the programmes that the so called fiscal stimulus package is going to be used for...so the Tories are the nasty party because they won't support your policies...but let's not package that premise that way, it needs to be packaged for the usual Labour mong...of which there seemed to be a fair few in the audience.

What a dishonest bitch she is..or is just the whole Labour party?

President Blair?

2009-10-04T03:10:00.001-07:00

I don't think so.

Blair will not be the EU President.

Brown and Labour, his major backers, are out of power in a few months so have nothing left to offer, and the French have milked the dodgy deal already. They will renege on the deals they did; rebate given away along with vetoes, and make new dodgy deals with Cameron and the Tories.

The Tories are now in a win-win situation. If Bliar is made President they have a rod with which to bash Labour over dodgy deals and also to make their stand on the EU firmer and more justified, and if Blair is denied the EU Presidency they will take the credit for this dodgy, dishonest shyster being kept out of the job and left to wallow in ignominy.

War with the unions...part 2

2009-10-03T01:29:00.001-07:00

In the late seventies and early eighties one of the best things Thatcher did was to battle and beat the unions.

The snivelling fucking cowards of the Labour party, in hock to and financed by the unions, are now, like then, genuflecting to the unions as always and the unions are once again flexing their antidemocratic muscles. They are a potted version of the EU; unelected but holding power though finances they have not earned and waste on pet and discredited projects.

When the Tories get into power they must make a foray to start the next battle with the unions, and I suspect this is already being planned as the last of the nails are hammered firmly into Labours coffin lid. A cap on donations from organisations, an OPT IN to subs being used for donations for members of the unions is also a good start as opposed to an opt out. These would be the start. The Labour party is now completely reliant on the unions, whose money comes from hard working people with little appetite to take them on on a personal level, so cameron must make this easier for them.

Tearing the Sun up on stage was a mistake. Labour ministers and hierarchy have no grace when the Sun went to the Tories was also a great mistake; that unilateral acrimonious split will come back to haunt them.

Too many people, far too many who should know better, have dismissed the Sun support as insignificant; I disagree and think it is almost as important as it was twenty years ago. The unions will find this out too.

Mrs Dale

2009-10-02T15:19:00.000-07:00

Got to make comment on Iain Dales righteous indignation over a Mail article that basically took him to task over his call to poofs to flock to his pink standard as a Tory candidate for Bracknell. I think the Mail got it exactly right; they have said that he said they should come out [sic] and vote for him because he is homosexual. He is on his high horse and is threatening action and all sorts of handbags at dawn affairs.

The Mail have, quite rightly, told him in no uncertain terms to fuck off.

Okay, listen to me you fucking whining queen. What would you have said if someone had called for people to vote for them because they are heterosexual? That person would probably have been arrested, and cock sucking cunts like you would be beating your breast about they are homophobic and should not be allowed to stand for parliament.

Bit different now the fucking boot is on the other foot isn't it? Should we call for your nomination to be blocked because you are obviously heterophobic?

Stop fucking whining you prat and stop being discriminatory.

Go Czech Republic Go!!

2009-09-22T11:16:00.000-07:00

The Czechs have started a petition to delay ratification of the Lisbon Treaty and it could mean a delay of at least some months, and that is no-one else tries to stall ratification, which is very likely.

Brown and Labour have been pushing for a quick ratification before any UK elections are held and Cameron and the Tories call a referendum on the treaty...which could, and probably would, scupper Blairs dodgy and dirty deal to be the EU President.

Oh dear, what a pity, never mind.

To clarify...

2009-08-25T11:29:00.000-07:00

I've been asked to clarify why I named Mrs Dale and Paul Staines as total cunts in the first post, so fair enough, but this is the first and last on the subject.

You may have noticed that they have both went from quite a big high, especially in terms of comments, to a slowly dwindling few. Dale is way down, and Staines went from a high of 1-2k to now most threads being a few hundred. This is for a number of reasons.

It stems from when Derek (spit) Draper accused them of being racist, and right wing etc. etc. because of their threads and comments, and the people commenting. Draper did this as a deliberate ploy to try and discredit his much betters blog while he tried to build Labourlist into something worth reading. Instead of fighting back and telling Draper to fuck off, both Dale and Staines buckled under and shit their little pants to the extent where they are now flaccid shadows of their former selves. In effect that detestable little cunt Draper said boo, you're bad, and Dale and Staines said sorry we won't do it again, now can we suck your cock Mr Draper? And proceeded to do so.

Dale's blog was a good debating platform where you could say pretty much what you wanted, until he discovered he wanted a safe Tory seat and then Draper called him a racist for allowing comments on his blog that DRAPER decided were racist. Like a good little Labour lapdog he moderated everything and became the very epitome of the gentleman politician blogger complete with conscience and carefully PC avoidance of any possibility of being labeled by a Labour party cunt like Draper. He alienated his followers and the people that made his fucking blog what it was. Another aspect of Dale, partly shared with Staines, is that he has become a real Labour cock sucking stooge on his site. He likes Kerry McCarthy and Tom Harris and endlessly promotes their blogs and witterings, amongst others like Bob Piper. Here's a little message for utter cunts like Dale...these are fucking Labour fucking arseholes and don't deserve to be liked or respected, they put cnts like Bliar and Brown into power and kept them there, and they helped fucking this country up. I think Dale should grow up and grow some balls and start treating these people with the contempt they deserve, if for no better reason than to fuck their electoral chances up.

Seriously, is it me?

Now we come to Staines. Order Order started out as a collection of people who spoke their minds and used language that could be described as colourful. Staines let this through as long as it wasn't boring and the site grew as he collected a following, and rightly so. It was probably around now that he discovered he enjoyed the accolade that came with a following. Then came the first cruncher in this sorry individuals progress when he made an utter cunt of himself on Newsnight. He was skewered and royally arse fucked by a sorry cunt called White (giggle) I feel sure this made him feel a little sorry for himself but he made it worse by then being caught drink driving, and odious little cunts like Alex Hilton got a whiff and made him feel even smaller. So here he was, the darling of the freedome loving blogosphere made to look an utter fucking prat multiple times...then along comes Derek (spit) Draper and Labourlist to make his life even worse. He went the same was as Mrs Dale above, and for virtually now the same reasons. There was a massive resurgence recently, but that is falling back now as people from Labour, with cunts like Dales help, take hold of the blogosphere.

Political correctness has killed the mass blogosphere that Dale and Staines started in, and these fucking idiots have actively worked to make it so by being scared of upsetting this or that group, and especially utter pieces of scum fucking cunt like Draper.

Dale and Staines were made by the people on their blogs, they are fuckall without these people. These people used words like 'cunt' all the time, as real people do in real life, but Dale and Staines are now too scared to even allow it said on their blogs. They are a shallow and flaccid shadow of the blogs they were and deserve to disappear into the obscurity they arose from. A blog is only as good as the people who visit, and both these blogs, despite the cock waving stat porn these fucking sad individuals use to justify their existence.

So fuck them.

Long time coming...

2009-08-23T15:17:00.000-07:00

This the first post here and while there will be more they may come in dribs and drabs. I had another blog where I posted regularly and had a bit of a following, but after a problem where another blogger was accused of doing something I did, a few graphics of a Labour fucking arsehole I decided to curb blogging. Also, not least because the people associated with me started beating their breasts and crying like the cowardly and craven fuckers they were that I had gone too far. Well fuck the lot of you now and I have never returned to those blogs again. They fought the good fight right up until they had to stand up and be counted.

Anyhoo, I digress and follow just a select few blogs now, though I sometimes wonder why. Guido Fawkes is one, though why is beyond me as he has become a flaccid and boring shadow if what made the fucking thing what it is; but it is dying slowly. Iain Dale too, and it suffers the same fate as Order Order. Both those blogs, orginally, allowed free and frank debate, and language, and that is what made them, but now they have gone all...suck Drapers cock as he might accuse us again...and they have sold out to the establishment for a few choice column inches in MSM. Cunts the pair of them, though I still pop in to look.

Fido at the Lone Voice, GOT of course, BOM, the Slicker, Dizzy, John Redwood, ConHome, Is a Cunt and a few other more obscure ones. Used to do the likes of Mr Eugenides and others but they proved themselves to be twats.

So, first post down and I will not adhere to fucking twats like Dale demanding we stick to an agreement not to attack other bloggers; you're first up you fucking simpering cunt with a post tomorrow that has been brewing for a while.